Difference between revisions of "Talk:Cons"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "will probably need to move this into something like cons (Guild) and keep Cons for consumables... actually I can't believe we don't already have a page on consumables...") |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
will probably need to move this into something like [[cons (Guild)]] and keep [[Cons]] for consumables... actually I can't believe we don't already have a page on consumables --[[User:HasKha|HasKha]] ([[User talk:HasKha|talk]]) 20:06, 4 January 2017 (CET) | will probably need to move this into something like [[cons (Guild)]] and keep [[Cons]] for consumables... actually I can't believe we don't already have a page on consumables --[[User:HasKha|HasKha]] ([[User talk:HasKha|talk]]) 20:06, 4 January 2017 (CET) | ||
| + | :Yeah +1. I suppose [[Cons]] could also list any relevant summon stones, unless you want a page for those as well? [[User:Cruz|Cruz]] ([[User talk:Cruz|talk]]) 02:22, 5 January 2017 (CET) | ||
| + | ::[[cons]] should be a disambiguation page linking to [[con set]], [[pcons]], and [[cons (Guild)]]. I'll let you guys fight over the capitalization, but IMO they should all be lower case, because they're not proper nouns (except the guild tag). Summoning stones are almost never referred to as "cons", but you can mention them on the [[cons]] page if you really want. Each type of stone should have its own page, describing how to acquire it and the pros and cons of the summoned ally. Even the obscure shitty stuff like [[Arctic Summoning Stone]] should be documented, because no matter how stupid something is, you'll find some awful dumbass who'll use it, and they need to be told why they're wrong. [[User:Mistie|Mistie]] ([[User talk:Mistie|talk]]) 13:17, 5 January 2017 (CET) | ||
| + | :::Why does conset and pcons need different pages? Isn't it easier for people looking up cons if it's all in one place? [[User:Cruz|Cruz]] ([[User talk:Cruz|talk]]) 16:30, 5 January 2017 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Why'd ya remove the "pros and cons" definition? )= surely that phrase is used commonly enough in relation to SCs to be on here... [[User:Mistie|Mistie]] ([[User talk:Mistie|talk]]) 20:32, 7 January 2017 (CET) | ||
| + | :I don't think so, no. [[User:Cruz|Cruz]] ([[User talk:Cruz|talk]]) 07:40, 13 January 2017 (CET) | ||
Latest revision as of 06:40, 13 January 2017
will probably need to move this into something like cons (Guild) and keep Cons for consumables... actually I can't believe we don't already have a page on consumables --HasKha (talk) 20:06, 4 January 2017 (CET)
- Yeah +1. I suppose Cons could also list any relevant summon stones, unless you want a page for those as well? Cruz (talk) 02:22, 5 January 2017 (CET)
- cons should be a disambiguation page linking to con set, pcons, and cons (Guild). I'll let you guys fight over the capitalization, but IMO they should all be lower case, because they're not proper nouns (except the guild tag). Summoning stones are almost never referred to as "cons", but you can mention them on the cons page if you really want. Each type of stone should have its own page, describing how to acquire it and the pros and cons of the summoned ally. Even the obscure shitty stuff like Arctic Summoning Stone should be documented, because no matter how stupid something is, you'll find some awful dumbass who'll use it, and they need to be told why they're wrong. The Mistyreous Mystery of Misty (talk) 13:17, 5 January 2017 (CET)
Why'd ya remove the "pros and cons" definition? )= surely that phrase is used commonly enough in relation to SCs to be on here... The Mistyreous Mystery of Misty (talk) 20:32, 7 January 2017 (CET)
