Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
we should add links to those (MQSC and MTSC), however I'm not sure on how to fit them on the main page. I'll try something, but I'm open to suggestions. --[[User:HasKha|HasKha]] ([[User talk:HasKha|talk]]) 18:56, 23 August 2017 (CEST) | we should add links to those (MQSC and MTSC), however I'm not sure on how to fit them on the main page. I'll try something, but I'm open to suggestions. --[[User:HasKha|HasKha]] ([[User talk:HasKha|talk]]) 18:56, 23 August 2017 (CEST) | ||
:Maybe "Elite Missions & Factions Farming VQs" should just say "Factions SCs" or similar, and all MTSC and MQSC pages can be together under "Vanquishes"? [[User:Mistie|Mistie]] ([[User talk:Mistie|talk]]) 16:53, 25 August 2017 (CEST) | :Maybe "Elite Missions & Factions Farming VQs" should just say "Factions SCs" or similar, and all MTSC and MQSC pages can be together under "Vanquishes"? [[User:Mistie|Mistie]] ([[User talk:Mistie|talk]]) 16:53, 25 August 2017 (CEST) | ||
| + | :: sure, that sounds good as well --[[User:HasKha|HasKha]] ([[User talk:HasKha|talk]]) 21:33, 25 August 2017 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 19:33, 25 August 2017
Other websites
I think we should definitely have prominent links to sites such as GWSCR and the official wiki, but what about having actual articles for them? That should be a good idea, because it allows us to explain them in our own terms e.g. why the official wiki does not make this one obsolete The Mistyreous Mystery of Misty (talk) 13:42, 19 August 2016 (CEST)
- We might want to add a box for "Community", articles on:
- * community websites such as gwscr, subreddit, wiki, pvx, gwlegacy, (fbgm forums?)
- * community creations such as toolbox, pawned, umod/texmod, kamadan website thingy
- However, that will create a new line of just one box, which sounds horrifying. We could split Elite Missions and Dungeons in 2 boxes, but that still leaves us with an empty one. --HasKha (talk) 22:17, 19 August 2016 (CEST)
- I guess those faction speedvanquishes could go in the empty box?? ʕ •ᴥ•ʔ Voxxy (talk) 10:19, 24 August 2016 (CEST)
- Added equipment instead, Unreal said it was your idea, and I like those pages.
Plain external links General standardising
Should external links on pages to GWW be standardised to plain links, or should it be clear that they're external with the icon? Plain links make pages look cleaner imo. ʕ •ᴥ•ʔ Voxxy (talk) 21:08, 25 August 2016 (CEST)
- External links should look like external links IMO. We have lots of pages with the same names as GWW pages, and it should be clear whether any link to one of those pages is external or not. The Mistyreous Mystery of Misty (talk) 12:29, 26 August 2016 (CEST)
Faction farming VQs
we should add links to those (MQSC and MTSC), however I'm not sure on how to fit them on the main page. I'll try something, but I'm open to suggestions. --HasKha (talk) 18:56, 23 August 2017 (CEST)
- Maybe "Elite Missions & Factions Farming VQs" should just say "Factions SCs" or similar, and all MTSC and MQSC pages can be together under "Vanquishes"? The Mistyreous Mystery of Misty (talk) 16:53, 25 August 2017 (CEST)
