Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"
Talk:Main Page
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
: * community websites such as gwscr, subreddit, wiki, pvx, gwlegacy, (fbgm forums?) | : * community websites such as gwscr, subreddit, wiki, pvx, gwlegacy, (fbgm forums?) | ||
: * community creations such as toolbox, pawned, umod/texmod, kamadan website thingy | : * community creations such as toolbox, pawned, umod/texmod, kamadan website thingy | ||
| − | : However, that will create a new line of just one box, which sounds horrifying. We could split Elite Missions and Dungeons in 2 boxes, but that still leaves us with an empty one. | + | : However, that will create a new line of just one box, which sounds horrifying. We could split Elite Missions and Dungeons in 2 boxes, but that still leaves us with an empty one. --[[User:HasKha|HasKha]] ([[User talk:HasKha|talk]]) 22:17, 19 August 2016 (CEST) |
| + | |||
| + | :: Oh well I did it --[[User:HasKha|HasKha]] ([[User talk:HasKha|talk]]) 22:17, 19 August 2016 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 20:17, 19 August 2016
Other websites
I think we should definitely have prominent links to sites such as GWSCR and the official wiki, but what about having actual articles for them? That should be a good idea, because it allows us to explain them in our own terms e.g. why the official wiki does not make this one obsolete The Mistyreous Mystery of Misty (talk) 13:42, 19 August 2016 (CEST)
- We might want to add a box for "Community", articles on:
- * community websites such as gwscr, subreddit, wiki, pvx, gwlegacy, (fbgm forums?)
- * community creations such as toolbox, pawned, umod/texmod, kamadan website thingy
- However, that will create a new line of just one box, which sounds horrifying. We could split Elite Missions and Dungeons in 2 boxes, but that still leaves us with an empty one. --HasKha (talk) 22:17, 19 August 2016 (CEST)
