Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"
Talk:Main Page
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:::: Added equipment instead, Unreal said it was your idea, and I like those pages. | :::: Added equipment instead, Unreal said it was your idea, and I like those pages. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Plain external links == | ||
| + | Should external links on pages to GWW be standardised to plain links, or should it be clear that they're external with the icon? Plain links make pages look cleaner imo. [[User:Voxxy|Voxxy]] ([[User talk:Voxxy|talk]]) 21:08, 25 August 2016 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 19:08, 25 August 2016
Other websites
I think we should definitely have prominent links to sites such as GWSCR and the official wiki, but what about having actual articles for them? That should be a good idea, because it allows us to explain them in our own terms e.g. why the official wiki does not make this one obsolete The Mistyreous Mystery of Misty (talk) 13:42, 19 August 2016 (CEST)
- We might want to add a box for "Community", articles on:
- * community websites such as gwscr, subreddit, wiki, pvx, gwlegacy, (fbgm forums?)
- * community creations such as toolbox, pawned, umod/texmod, kamadan website thingy
- However, that will create a new line of just one box, which sounds horrifying. We could split Elite Missions and Dungeons in 2 boxes, but that still leaves us with an empty one. --HasKha (talk) 22:17, 19 August 2016 (CEST)
- I guess those faction speedvanquishes could go in the empty box?? ʕ •ᴥ•ʔ Voxxy (talk) 10:19, 24 August 2016 (CEST)
- Added equipment instead, Unreal said it was your idea, and I like those pages.
Plain external links
Should external links on pages to GWW be standardised to plain links, or should it be clear that they're external with the icon? Plain links make pages look cleaner imo. ʕ •ᴥ•ʔ Voxxy (talk) 21:08, 25 August 2016 (CEST)
